
MIKE’S BLOG
ON WINNIPEGFREEPRESS.COM
JOIN
THE MIKE ON CRIME
MAILING LIST
CRIME AND PUNISHMENT
Syndicated National Radio Show with Mike McIntyre
NEW TIME
SUNDAYS 7 pm - 9 pm CST
BROWSE ARTICLES
Ask the Judge
Cold Cases
Crime and Punishment Radio Show
International Crime News
Manitoba Crime News
Mike in Books
Mike In The Community
Mike’s Bio
Mike’s Favourites
National Crime News
The Lighter Side of the Law
Voice of the Victims
Winnipeg’s Hot Cars of the Day
LINKS
- Mike McIntyre on TWITTER
- Winnipeg Free Press
- What If Sports Fantasy Leagues
- Jason van Rassel: Crime Reporter
- THE DOE NETWORK
- Peter Warren
- Charles Adler
- Amazon.ca - "To The Grave"
- The Smoking Gun
- Bouck's Law Blog
- Canadian Missing Adults
- Full Comment - National Post Blogs
- Great Plains Publications
- James Turner - The Crime Scene
- Manitoba Organization of Victim Assistance (MOVA)
- Missing Children's Society
- Patent and the Pantry
- PETITION for change to the Not Criminally Responsible legislation
- PrimeTimeCrime
- Scared Monkeys
- TJ's Gift Foundation
- Tyler Pelke
- Vision For Justice
- Winnipeg CrimeStat Program
JURY POLL
JURY POLL QUESTION - Federal government asking for public input on random breathalyzer tests
DATE: Mar 11, 06:18 PM
Agree or disagree? Vote in the JURY POLL question at the bottom of this website.
By THE CANADIAN PRESS
OTTAWA – The federal government is mulling over the idea of allowing random breathalyzer tests.
The Justice Department has posted a discussion paper on its website, noting that breath-testing provisions in the Criminal Code are now 40 years old.
It’s one of a number of ideas contained in the discussion document, which also includes a proposal to increase penalties for repeat offenders.
The government is acting on a report from a Commons committee that suggested random testing last year.
The government notes that in some European countries, Australia and New Zealand police can require motorists stopped at roadside checks to submit to testing.
Last fall NDP Leader Jack Layton indicated he would support such tests.
But civil libertarians oppose such laws, concerned that giving police the power to act randomly would be a violation of a person’s right to protection against unreasonable search and seizure.
The government discussion paper is giving groups and the public until April 30 to weigh in on the issue.
